If the meaning of life is to have fun, then how do you have fun?

------Reality is just working at surviving no matter how you look at it, and no matter how easy or hard it is for you in particular to survive. So there is no other point to life really other than surviving. Your job keeps you occupied to make money to survive. You date people to prolong the species. You eat food to survive. You look at things to collect info about everything to survive. We explore the world or anything for no particular reason , maybe to stay sane, but mostly to either make a home somewhere else or toexperience new things to keep our brain active and healthy.----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------But your personal reality or life is determined to you by these factors:--------------------

1. What you are given to percieve
2. What you allow or don't allow yourself to percieve, and
3. How your brain interprets what you are percieving
4. And all of the above are given to you by your senses/feelings however strong they are

-----For instance, an example of #1 is if you are rich you have more options or parts of life on earth to experience. But if you grew up rich then your perception of all of your extraordinary experiences would be mundaine or even boring because you grew up with it your whole life and desensitised to it. But also if you were put into a poor persons shoes after being rich your whole life it would be the worst experience ever. for you even though it's normal for everybody else.

-----An example of #3 would be if you find looking at or being with the opposite sex fun, then your perception(senses) of them is thought in your brain( based on the gene programs that made your brain, most likely) as good or fun. But the same perception (senses) of the same situation by a person without an interest in the opposite sex, would see the situation as normal or not fun based on how there bain in particular interprets the perceptions-----Also if you present yourself as a good perception(being clean/ put together) to someone you like, then it will be more likely that they will find it fun to look at or be around you. wich there are some pipe dreamers that say that they will only clean up there act after they're already in a relationship------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----An example of #2 and more is-If you get rid of all human created bad from your life, but still keep all human created good, then you would be choosing to only percieve good things, and if you could also find those things fun, by the way your brain is interpreting the perceptions(senses) (example of #3). And if you had all earthly desires and could afford to experience all aspects of life, either through new technologies or homemade utopia, or by having the money to(example of #1). Then you would effectively be the happiest person on earth. But , I guess in the end, there would still be no meaning other than survival----------------------------------------

-----I guess there's having the opportunity to be happy, and then there's actually feeling happy or having fun. And being able to sustain it the rest of your life.

psychics

-----The problem with predicting the future is sorting your own imagination from actual images of the future and of it being reliable enough stream of information to give you a full picture. Why don't you just bet on the winning #'s and be rich and not need to write books on being psychic to make a living. ----- The future may be predictable if you use shortcuts though, by predicting specific things, like the weather for instance, where you generally know the parameters and can compute the events to follow this is using the law of "Cause and Effect". Cause and effect being the one reason that you can't travel back in time. So unless you can manipulate cause and effect it's not possible. or the one thing in the universe that I personally think is impossible. Except maybe living forever. -----But anyways if you tried to set the parameters for predicting the full future you would need the data of every partical down to the infinitely micro scale (atoms and smaller)and it's state and you would also require all of the information for all particals in the infinitely macro scale(galaxies/universe) and then you would need to calculate for every second into the future that you wanted to predict. and since seconds can be infinitely disected into smaller increments of time then to calculate the future with your infinite knowledge of the universe and an infinite sized computer. The size of the data needed would be (infinite X infiniteX infinite= smallest prediction of the future possible)

frictionless communicator

-----Supposedly if you had a fluctuating high voltage(static) feild that was the lowest amperage possible to carry a signal , there is 0.00 friction for that signal(almost like superfluidity) -----The reasoning behind this is that high voltage power lines have nearly no friction and can travel in thinner wires also with higher voltage. And also at higher voltages regular insulators become conductors due to ionisation (like air conducts electricity in a lightning bolt). So what if you had a high enough voltage that you could pass a signal thru any material in all directions and the only thing that could detect it was a metal receiver tuned to that frequency? -----Also if you could take advantage of interference patterns of 2 coherent signals and control the interference patterns to propogate outwards forever (like a step up frequency instead of a step up power transformer) and then stepped down the frequency at the reciever and translate the signal then you may have infinite channel possibilities and also have travelled across the world at the normal speed of light but you wouldn't have had any signal loss or resistance along the way and may use the same power as a regular cell phone, and had infinite channels. And because of the 0.00 signal loss you may not need to have actual base stations to boost the signal to a sattelite or maybe even you wouldn't even need as much energy as modern cell phones need to transmit a signal to a base station because they would go infinite distance on the very first weak signal and have no resistance along the way ---------- so simplified it's high voltage /"interference pattern utilising" infinite frequencies/ low wattage needed/ no resistance communicator device

infinite new materials

If you were to have genetically modified plants or organisms grow there own special organic materials that were useful, you could get cheaper more replenishable materials. - Some examples of useful naturally grown materials are : rubber, food, drink, cotton hard wood. - But this list of materials could be expanded into yet unknown usefull organic material types such as : maybe fresh water from a plant, or super insulator material, or new environmentally friendly and cheap glues, or new medical herbs. Or unlimited variations. - We have genetically engineered things already by selectively breeding animals and plants like corn. But with new technologies we could make infinite new more useful organisms. And protect ourselves from any new deadly organisms with our new good organisms. The genetic code is like computer programming and can function in different ways for every genetic mutation

Faster than light communication

For the technology concerning a high power laser relay in space between earth and another planet, I have a theory as to why faster than light communication is possible in that way. I call it the theory of "viscousity of space" I call it that because I beleive that space acts in every way identical to all of the properties of a fluid. -"suction/repulsion" (we call it air pressure on earth); -"viscousity" (friction); -"shockwaves/sound/vibration"; -"weight"(just the size of the particals); and maybe even -"surface tention". The reason I beleive that there are particals infinitely micro enough to make space act like a fluid is that we split the atom and it turned out that matter was made of energy and that also there are quarks and nutrinoes that are so small that you can't even detect them anyway, so its not a stretch to think that there are smaller particals that make up these quarks and nutrinoes. I'll get to the interplanitary relay after I explain the science behind it that I theorise is true based on my own understanding of science to back it up. "suction/repultion/pressure"- is +/- charges in that it's a pressure change that makes electrons flow like weather systems. But instead of high/low pressure systems that push the air around, it is the +/- of protons and electrons that are the high and low pressure systems and the air is the infinitessimal particals of space that flow in and out of the pressure systems. And a high pressure differential is what causes the force called voltage. "viscousity" -Takes the form as your perception of time. Einstein himself said that if you travel at faster and faster speeds, time passage slows down for you personally. They even tested it once on nova or some other science show by travelling with an atomic clock on a jet and there was a slight time differential. But the way I will demonstrate how time is the viscousity of space is with this thought experiment- - If you were to use water as a lubricant in a cars bearings it would have a lot of friction wich is why we use motor oil because it has the least friction that we can make cheaply. And that is because of low viscousity. Now imagine that you submerged a mechanical clock in motor oil. All of the parts of the clock would move faster than if they were submerged in water. And effectively the time on the particular watch submerged in water, would move slower relative to the other watch that was submerged in oil. So I propose that there is differing densities of space particals that can make time appear to move faster only because of less thick (viscous) areas of space, making you move in every aspect like a well oiled machine. My (or the astronomers) evidence of this is what they call "dark matter" or "weakly interacting massive particles" wich exist in some alternate dimention that can never be prooven, and that these are contributing to the mass of gallaxies and making the outer edges of galaxies move faster than they should be from the actual observable mass of the galaxy. My simpler explaination for this effect (and please proove me wrong if I am) is that just like our atmosphere gets thinner the higher up you get, the same is true, I beleive, that space gets thinner the farther out from the center of the galaxy you get. And as I explained earlier when you are in thin space you move like a well oiled machine and time seemingly moves faster for you. But on earth astronomers see it as appearing to be a faster rotation(at the edge of the galaxy) from a gravitational effect. "sound/shockwave/vibration"- When we hear real sound we don't say "A sound partical hit my ear and I detected it's beam and called it sound". We instead say "A shock wave scrunched air particals together in a chain reacion and the very last partical that was bumped by another partical happenned to then bump my ear drum as sound". . . . .... . . . . ... . . .(example of sound wave)(scrunched then spread apart) That is what I theorise light is . and the very last partical(photon) in the chain that bumps the detector is what we call the ray or beam of light. When it's only the illusion of movement. And the reason why Einstein said that light acts as a partical and as a wave is because it is an actual partical but the wave is the same as sound in air, and air has in a sense the same properties as photons. And the reason that light can force electrons on a photovoltaic cell to move, is that light effects electrons in the same way as magnets effect electrons, in that light is only a super fast electromagnetic flux. With microwaves(magnetron) being the next slowest. Then radio or ac being slower. And then just turning a magnet on/off being the slowest electromagnetic flux. In other words I theorise that magnetic flux lines are made up of photons. Now for the problem of lasers which I will explain as the same as talking into the center of a parabolic dish. All of the sound that reflects off of it goes in one direction forever. Now for instance say that the sound that you emanate from the center of the dish is from a tuning fork. You then have a resonant frequency that travels in a straight line or effectively the same characteristics as a laser. explaining how under the previously stated laws of physics, lasers would work. So now to explain how high powered lasers would effectively speed up the speed of light. The effect that a high powered beam of laser shockwave(the same as a unidirectional sound wave) would have on the space particals in the way of the trajectory is that it would push them off to the side right after the front of the laser beam pushed them like a wedge,out of the way(in the same way as a speed boat parts water). Therefore making a low partical mass conduit behind the wave front. And low space partical mass would effectively make time seem to travel faster(for anything in the wake of the laser) in that conduit. And if the beam were kept active indefinitely in an interlinked highway between planets and it was used as a carrier wave the same as radio is by using "FM", electromagnetic frequency fluctuations along with the laser. Or "AM" as a tiny fluctuation of the beam itself. Then you would have, after establishment, an indefinite, faster than light communication system. And undoubtedly in deep space you can use superconductors for no energy loss of power supply. Oh, and also at the wave front, while beam is being established, the faster than light travel photons behind the wave front would catch up to the front and collect(sort of like how electrons collect at the tips of wires) and create a surge then drop off when it reaches the other planet. Further things along these lines to research would be- - Why is the sattelite voyager slowing down (or is it speeding up) the further it gets from earth? Is it a trick of the speed of light where there is less gravity out there (remember how Einstien said gravity is a warpage of space so there should be less compact space out there)? or is the space ship itself travelling faster relative to us? - Also research why the universeas a whole is aparrently expanding faster. Is that also a trick of the speed of light in less dense space? Well that's how I see the laser relay working and it makes complete and total sense to me so far. So even Einstein said that time is relative like everything else. And remember that some things don't naturally happen in nature. But that doesn't mean that can't make it happen artificially. If that was true we wouldn't have ever made the hammer because it was unnatural, let alone computers. Also back up evidense of my theory is that light slows down in dense translucent material wich is what they call "refractive index" and what causes light of different frequencies to travel at different speeds as it passes thru a material, and when it comes out the other side the light of different frequencies are then on a different path (instead of together as white light) wich is what we see as a rainbow. Just remember, it is the person that stops beleiving that anything is possible that is always prooven wrong.